All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@gnudd.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] IP_t should be a "packed" struct
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:37:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090129103711.GA32504@mail.gnudd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090129102022.A71D3832E416@gemini.denx.de>

> Now study the data structures used  for  netwrking  -  they  are  all
> carefully  crafted that the natural aligment "just fits", i. e. there
> are no gaps between variables if they are aligned naturally.

Actually, a packed structure not only doesn't have gaps, but can live
at any address. So the compiler must access it byte-by-byte
regardless.  This means that a naturally-aligned structure performs
much worse if declared as packed. And single-word loads and stores are
not atomic any more.

I tried with eldk-4.2 for arm and an older gcc for mips, I have
no ppc or other archs handy right now:

   #include <stdint.h>
   #include <stdio.h>

   #ifdef PACKEDTEST
   #  define P __attribute__ ((packed))
   #else
   #  define P
   #endif

   struct {uint32_t i; uint16_t s; uint8_t c, d;} P datum;

   uint32_t i;
   uint16_t s;
   uint8_t c;

   int main(int argc, char **argv)
   {
   	printf("ih\n");
   	i = datum.i;
   	printf("oh\n");
   	s = datum.s;
   	printf("ah\n");
   	c = datum.c;
   	return 0;
   }  

Compilation: ARM non-packed (only interesting lines):

    8378:       e5942000        ldr     r2, [r4]
    8384:       e5832000        str     r2, [r3]

    838c:       e1d420b4        ldrh    r2, [r4, #4]
    8398:       e1c320b0        strh    r2, [r3]

    83a0:       e5d42006        ldrb    r2, [r4, #6]
    83ac:       e5c32000        strb    r2, [r3]

Compilation: ARM packed (only interesting lines):

    8378:       e5d42001        ldrb    r2, [r4, #1]
    837c:       e5d43000        ldrb    r3, [r4]
    8380:       e5d40002        ldrb    r0, [r4, #2]
    8384:       e5d41003        ldrb    r1, [r4, #3]
    8388:       e1833402        orr     r3, r3, r2, lsl #8
    838c:       e1833800        orr     r3, r3, r0, lsl #16
    8394:       e1833c01        orr     r3, r3, r1, lsl #24
    8398:       e5823000        str     r3, [r2]

    83a4:       e5d43005        ldrb    r3, [r4, #5]
    83a8:       e5d42004        ldrb    r2, [r4, #4]
    83b0:       e1822403        orr     r2, r2, r3, lsl #8
    83b8:       e1c320b0        strh    r2, [r3]

    83c0:       e5d42006        ldrb    r2, [r4, #6]
    83cc:       e5c32000        strb    r2, [r3]

Compilation: MIPS non-packed (only interesting lines):

  44:   8e030000        lw      v1,0(s0)
  5c:   ac230000        sw      v1,0(at)

  74:   96030004        lhu     v1,4(s0)
  8c:   a4230000        sh      v1,0(at)

  a4:   92030006        lbu     v1,6(s0)
  bc:   a0230000        sb      v1,0(at)


Compilation: MIPS packed (only interesting lines):

  44:   8a030003        lwl     v1,3(s0)
  48:   9a030000        lwr     v1,0(s0)
  60:   ac230000        sw      v1,0(at)

  78:   92030005        lbu     v1,5(s0)
  7c:   92020004        lbu     v0,4(s0)
  80:   00031a00        sll     v1,v1,0x8
  84:   00621825        or      v1,v1,v0
  9c:   a4230000        sh      v1,0(at)

  b4:   92030006        lbu     v1,6(s0)
  cc:   a0230000        sb      v1,0(at)


/alessandro

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-29 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-27 18:32 [U-Boot] IP_t should be a "packed" struct Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
2009-01-28  9:42 ` Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
2009-01-28 17:55 ` Ben Warren
2009-01-28 18:36   ` Jerry Van Baren
2009-01-28 18:58     ` Ben Warren
2009-01-28 20:40       ` Luigi Mantellini
2009-01-28 21:21         ` Ben Warren
2009-01-28 21:38           ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-01-28 21:52             ` Ben Warren
2009-01-28 22:21               ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-01-28 22:16             ` Luigi Mantellini
2009-01-28 22:27               ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-01-28 23:04                 ` Luigi Mantellini
2009-01-29 10:20                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-01-29 10:37                     ` Alessandro Rubini [this message]
2009-01-28 20:58   ` Luigi Mantellini
2009-01-28 21:26     ` Wolfgang Denk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090129103711.GA32504@mail.gnudd.com \
    --to=rubini-list@gnudd.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.