From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: New home for i2c-tools (RFC) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:56:10 -0500 Message-ID: <200901291056.12963.vapier@gentoo.org> References: <20090129103717.025661db@hyperion.delvare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090129103717.025661db-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jean Delvare Cc: Linux I2C , Paul Goyette List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 29 January 2009 04:37:17 Jean Delvare wrote: > And there are other options available, such as Gna! or BerliOS. Never > used these myself though. > > [2] https://gna.org/ > [3] http://developer.berlios.de/ > > As far as I am concerned, I can live with all options, but what I > really want to know is: which option would potential future > contributors prefer? Please speak up if you care! any reason for not looking at sf.net ? they provide svn and everything else needed ... they dont provide git currently though so an easy upgrade path like is available with berlios is out of the question. a quick survey based on packages in gentoo shows sf.net is significantly more popular atm than berlios and gna (combined even). but yes, i could live with any of those sites ... -mike