All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: allow 8 more cpus could be used
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:08:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090129230827.GA29611@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4982315F.20705@kernel.org>


* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> Impact: fix left out MARCO
> >>
> >> X86_PC will be always enabled. so need to check if we have bigsmp 
> >> support built in before cut off more than 8 cpus.
> > 
> > ah, that's a leftover reference to X86_PC. It can now be removed, together 
> > with the Kconfig X86_PC option.
> > 
> >> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_PC) && defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_X86_PC) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_BIGSMP)
> >>  	if (def_to_bigsmp && nr_cpu_ids > 8) {
> >>  		unsigned int cpu;
> >>  		unsigned nr;
> > 
> > Could you please send a patch that removes both X86_PC and X86_BIGSMP - 
> > and removes the above cutoff code too, so that it will be built-in all the 
> > time?
> 
> sure. maybe we could keep X86_BIGSMP for a while. So someone don't 
> enable BIGSMP for small system?

yeah, we can certainly keep it - the code to conditionalize it is there 
and isnt causing problems really.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-29 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-29 22:18 [PATCH] x86: allow 8 more cpus could be used Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 22:19 ` [PATCH] x86: don't treat bigsmp as no standard Yinghai Lu
2009-01-30 14:25   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 22:42 ` [PATCH] x86: allow 8 more cpus could be used Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 22:44   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 23:08     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-29 23:14       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 23:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 22:44   ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-29 23:12     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 23:14       ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-29 23:22         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-29 23:23           ` Yinghai Lu
2009-01-29 23:25           ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-30  0:09             ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090129230827.GA29611@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.