From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] create workqueue threads only when needed
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:32:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090202113235.GB5757@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4986B205.2040807@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:42:45AM +0100, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 03:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:37:41AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I don't know, most of those I've looked on are not documented about the reason
> >> > > for a private workqueue. I guess most of them can use the usual kevent.
>
> I rather suspect that the majority of private workqueues are there for
> good reasons.
>
> >> > The main problem with kevent is that it gets clogged up.
> >>
> >> I don't think so. Here is a snapshot of the workqueue tracer in my
> >> box currently:
> >
> > That's not quite what I meant ...
> >
> > The main problem with keventd I'd say is that it's used in all sort of
> > exeptional code path (ie, driver reset path, error handling, etc...) for
> > things that will msleep happily for tenth milliseconds, that sort of
> > thing.
> >
> > IE. It will be pretty responsive -in general- but can suffer form
> > horrible latencies every now and then.
>
> Actually it /should/ be the other way around:
>
> The shared workqueue should only be used for work that sleeps only
> briefly (perhaps with the exception of very unlikely longer sleeps e.g.
> for allocations that cause paging).
>
> Work which /may/ sleep longer, for example performs SCSI transactions,
> needs to go into a private workqueue or other kind of context.
Right. But most of the time, these workqueues receive few events.
That's why async looks a good alternative for such cases. The threads
from async core which perform the jobs are created and destroyed on the fly,
depending on the number of jobs queued.
> OTOH you are right too; work which must not be deferred too long by work
> from another uncooperative/ unfair subsystem is probably also better off
> in an own workqueue...
Or callsites which use kevent and may sleep for too long could be identified
and fixed...
> Stefan Richter
> -=====-==--= --=- ---=-
> http://arcgraph.de/sr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-02 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-27 0:17 [RFC][PATCH] create workqueue threads only when needed Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 0:30 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-31 18:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-31 18:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-01-31 18:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-01 16:22 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-01 17:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 17:40 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-01 17:47 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 18:06 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-01 18:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-01 21:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 2:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-02 6:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 8:42 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-02 9:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 9:14 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-02 9:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 9:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-02 10:03 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-02 20:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-04 9:54 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-02-02 11:39 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-02 11:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-02-02 11:26 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-02 5:19 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-02 6:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-02 9:01 ` Stefan Richter
2009-02-02 14:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
[not found] ` <20090126162807.1131c777.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2009-01-27 1:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27 8:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 3:07 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2009-01-27 8:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-01-27 12:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02 14:49 ` Daniel Walker
2009-02-02 14:51 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
2009-02-02 15:40 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090202113235.GB5757@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.