From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LU9ny-0000Ti-Rq
	for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:10:22 -0500
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LU9nw-0000TT-UM
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:10:20 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LU9nv-0000TH-GI
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:10:20 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38924 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LU9nv-0000TE-BX
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:10:19 -0500
Received: from makefile.in ([64.79.213.230]:53602)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <bsd@makefile.in>) id 1LU9nu-0003qT-W8
	for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:10:19 -0500
Received: from aquamarine.localnet (pool-96-233-17-111.bstnma.east.verizon.net
	[96.233.17.111]) by makefile.in (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC31C417C4C4;
	Mon,  2 Feb 2009 17:10:16 -0800 (PST)
From: Bandan <bsd@makefile.in>
To: grub-devel@gnu.org
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:10:14 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.28-gentoo; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; )
References: <200901291911.11791.bsd@makefile.in> <49825D1E.9020706@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <49825D1E.9020706@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200902022010.14799.bsd@makefile.in>
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
Cc: phcoder <phcoder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Implementing commands from TODO  list
X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/grub-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:grub-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel>,
	<mailto:grub-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:10:21 -0000

Hi!
>
> Uppermem is i386-bound. I propose more general format:
> meminfo [-l] [-s VAR]
Sounds good to me.

> Which outputs total amount of memory.
> If launched with -s VAR this value is stored to variable
> If launched with -v it outputs complete memory map
>
So, would meminfo be the equivalent of displaymem that we had in grub-legacy 
(with a few modifications) ? Is there any reason to change the command name 
from displaymem to meminfo ?

Bandan
 
-- 
BSD