From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
To: Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@osadl.org>
Cc: m.luescher@vtxmail.ch, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: Hard lockup with 2.6.24.7-rt26 on x86
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:26:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090203102621.5eb71333@torg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4988664A.3080601@osadl.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:44:10 +0100
Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@osadl.org> wrote:
> Clark,
>
> >> On two different desktop PC (both Core 2 Duo) and on a notebook
> >> (Core Duo) the kernel (2.6.24.7-rt26, CONFIG_X86_32) locks up hard
> >> under a certain rt load. The failure can be reproduced reliably
> >> with the following command:
> >> sudo ./cyclictest -p99 -t10 -n -i250
> > My guess would be that since you're running 10 threads on two
> > processors at the highest available priority, you're starving all the
> > hard IRQ threads (as well as soft irq and other kernel threads).
> > This is one of those power-tool moments where you can lock up the
> > system with the wrong workload/priority combination.
> Hmm, I would agree immediately, if the tasks were using all of the CPU
> power. But this is not the case. In the present case, running
>
> # cyclictest -p99 -t10 -n -i250
>
> results in about 10% CPU load. So there is plenty of time in between to
> let the system respond. I can reproduce the problem here (2.6.24-rt,
> 2.6.26-rt, various configurations). The system does not crash every time
> when cyclictest is started, only once in about 5 trials or so. If it
> crashes, then it does so immediately after being started. Whenever
> cyclictest survives for several seconds, then it never crashes at a
> later time. I tend to believe that we have a bug here, not a regular
> behavior.
>
That's what I get for firing off a response with out running it first :)
I don't have a 2.6.26 test box handy, but I'll set that up this
afternoon. I agree with your results that this is a bug, since I
haven't been able to kill my 2.6.24.7-based RT test system and if it
was just starvation I should be able to do that easily.
Clark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmIcDMACgkQHyuj/+TTEp21DgCfUihH/6BUUS5o3SwlrnK57dJC
/HQAoMEZp8bYuOEBiS6wVtbGgA0vi0MS
=X1jB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-02 20:55 Hard lockup with 2.6.24.7-rt26 on x86 m.luescher
2009-02-03 15:00 ` Clark Williams
2009-02-03 15:44 ` Carsten Emde
2009-02-03 16:26 ` Clark Williams [this message]
2009-02-03 19:20 ` Remy Bohmer
[not found] ` <902d99b50902040046u3257591fxe29cef4e62315b1a@mail.gmail.com>
2009-02-04 11:56 ` Remy Bohmer
2009-02-04 12:31 ` Claus Gindhart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090203102621.5eb71333@torg \
--to=williams@redhat.com \
--cc=Carsten.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.luescher@vtxmail.ch \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.