All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RFC: ACPI: Interface for ACPI drivers to place quirk code which gets executed early
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:08:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902031408.12237.trenn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090202202246.GA9023@dreamland.darkstar.lan>

On Monday 02 February 2009 21:22:46 Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> Il Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 06:22:10PM +0100, Thomas Renninger ha scritto:
> > These two patches are tested on a ASUS machine and worked as expected,
> > but probably may still need some cleanup.
>
> I'd keep the DMI+HID approach since it's more flexible:
> - (AFAICS) Thinkpads have different methods for hwmon depending on the
>   model and no fixed HID
> - With DMI it would be possible to include ASUS motherboards (ATK w/
>   hwmon) but exclude ASUS laptops (ATK w/o hwmon).
I thought the ATK01[01]0 devices are ASUS specific.
I now found an ATK0100 (not the ATK0110 this is about) on a Sony and a
Samsung.
I still wonder why you want to restrict the check to ASUS.
Your ATK0110 driver would also load on any other machine which has such
a device. And why shouldn't a Samsung/Sony/... machine with a ATK0110
device not access the hwmon sensor through it?
Should we already look a bit deeper into the ATK0110 device in the quirk
to make sure it provides thermal, fan or other hwmon device accessing
functionality?

> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index c54d7b6..1c25747 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/kthread.h>
> >
> >  #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
> > +#include "acpi.h"
> >
> >  #define _COMPONENT		ACPI_BUS_COMPONENT
> >  ACPI_MODULE_NAME("scan");
> > @@ -1562,6 +1563,8 @@ static int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> >
> >  	if (result)
> >  		acpi_device_unregister(acpi_root, ACPI_BUS_REMOVAL_NORMAL);
> > +	else
> > +		acpi_device_quirks();
>
> Hum, it's not immediatly clear why you put that call in the else
> branch. Maybe put:
>
> if (!result)
>         acpi_device_quirks();
>
> before the cleanup?
Yes that looks ugly, yours is nicer...

Also thanks for the "auto not handled properly" hint, I forgot
that part.

Thanks,

    Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-03 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-25 21:05 [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources Luca Tettamanti
2009-01-26  8:37 ` Hans de Goede
2009-01-29 10:30 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 15:16   ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-01-29 16:29     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 18:58       ` Hans de Goede
2009-01-29 21:31         ` Jean Delvare
2009-01-30 14:29         ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-01 21:22           ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02  9:11             ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-02 11:38               ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 17:22                 ` [PATCH 1/2] RFC: ACPI: Interface for ACPI drivers to place quirk code which gets executed early Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 17:22                   ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 20:22                   ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 13:08                     ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
2009-02-03 13:45                       ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 13:45                         ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-03 14:19                         ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 13:37                     ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 17:22                 ` [PATCH 2/2] RFC: ACPI: Set enforce_resources to strict if a ATK0110 device is found in namespace Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 17:22                   ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-02 20:29                   ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-02 11:38             ` [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources Thomas Renninger
2009-01-29 21:15       ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-02-04  5:52     ` Len Brown
2009-02-04  6:05       ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-04  8:37         ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-04 13:17           ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-04 13:26             ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-04 14:20               ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-10 13:57                 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-10 14:08                   ` Matthew Garrett
2009-02-10 15:32                     ` Hans de Goede
2009-02-10 16:24                       ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-27 13:27                         ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-24 12:39                           ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-24 13:21                             ` Hans de Goede
2009-03-24 13:43                               ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-24 14:29                                 ` Hans de Goede
2009-03-29 20:16                               ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-29 20:33                                 ` Pavel Machek
2009-03-29 20:55                                 ` Jean Delvare
2009-03-29 22:01                                   ` Luca Tettamanti
2009-03-30  7:36                                     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-02 22:59                                     ` Len Brown
2009-04-03  9:40                                       ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-12 12:44                     ` Jean Delvare
2009-04-02 22:45         ` polling (Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources) Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200902031408.12237.trenn@suse.de \
    --to=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=kronos.it@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.