From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, mark.langsdorf@amd.com,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] CPUFREQ: ondemand/conservative: deprecate sampling_rate{min,max}
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:03:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090203210334.a99354ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233679606-1971-3-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de>
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:46:41 +0100 Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> wrote:
> static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_max(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> {
> + printk(KERN_INFO "CPUFREQ: conservative sampling_rate_max "
> + "sysfs file is deprecated - used by: %s\n", current->comm);
> return sprintf (buf, "%u\n", MAX_SAMPLING_RATE);
> }
I'd have thought that the user-irritation risk here is pretty high.
Would it make sense to throttle these or to make them once-per-boot
or something?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 5:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-03 16:46 CPUFREQ: Ondemand and powernow-k8 enhancements/fixes/cleanups Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] CPUFREQ: Introduce /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/cpuinfo_transition_latency Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 2/7] CPUFREQ: ondemand/conservative: deprecate sampling_rate{min,max} Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04 5:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] CPUFREQ: ondemand/conservative: sanitize sampling_rate restrictions Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04 5:07 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 10:07 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 4/7] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Get transition latency from ACPI _PSS table Thomas Renninger
2009-02-08 18:35 ` Robert Hancock
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 5/7] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Always compile powernow-k8 driver with ACPI support Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 6/7] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Only print error message once, not per core Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04 5:09 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 9:59 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 16:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] ACPI: cpufreq: Remove deprecated /proc/acpi/processor/../performance proc entries Thomas Renninger
2009-02-04 5:13 ` Len Brown
2009-02-03 16:48 ` CPUFREQ: Ondemand and powernow-k8 enhancements/fixes/cleanups Dave Jones
2009-02-03 21:21 ` Dave Jones
2009-02-03 23:29 ` Thomas Renninger
2009-02-03 23:44 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090203210334.a99354ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.