All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable bit 11 in _PDC to advertise hw coord
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:57:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090204085712.GF30821@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090202195717.GA24510@linux-os.sc.intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 02 2009, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> 
> Bit 11 in intel PDC definitions is meant for OS capability to handle
> hardware coordination of P-states. In Linux we have always supported
> hwardware coordination of P-states. Just let the BIOSes know that we
> support it, by setting this bit.
> 
> Some BIOSes use this bit to choose between hardware or software coordination
> and without this change below, BIOSes switch to software coordination, which
> is not very optimal in terms of power consumption and extra wakeups from idle.

I can confirm that this fixes the excessive reschedule ipi count on an
x60 with the ondemand governor. Can we please get this into 2.6.29?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
> 
> ---
>  include/acpi/pdc_intel.h |    2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/include/acpi/pdc_intel.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/acpi/pdc_intel.h	2009-01-20 16:11:20.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6/include/acpi/pdc_intel.h	2009-02-02 10:32:06.000000000 -0800
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #define ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD		(0x0080)
>  #define ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH		(0x0100)
>  #define ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH		(0x0200)
> +#define ACPI_PDC_SMP_P_HWCOORD		(0x0800)
>  
>  #define ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP	(ACPI_PDC_SMP_C1PT | \
>  					 ACPI_PDC_C_C1_HALT | \
> @@ -22,6 +23,7 @@
>  #define ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP	(ACPI_PDC_SMP_C1PT | \
>  					 ACPI_PDC_C_C1_HALT | \
>  					 ACPI_PDC_SMP_P_SWCOORD | \
> +					 ACPI_PDC_SMP_P_HWCOORD | \
>  					 ACPI_PDC_P_FFH)
>  
>  #define ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP	(ACPI_PDC_SMP_C2C3  | \

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-04  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-02 19:57 [PATCH] Enable bit 11 in _PDC to advertise hw coord Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-04  8:57 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-02-04 19:53   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-02-04 20:06     ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-02-04 20:40       ` Greg KH
2009-02-08 19:51         ` [stable] " Greg KH
2009-02-07  4:10 ` Len Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090204085712.GF30821@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.