From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Hin-Tak Leung <hintak.leung@gmail.com>
Cc: Ismael Ojeda Perez <iojedaperez@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: zd1211rw NEW RF Type
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:15:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090204161502.GD3845@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ace41890902040750v61e42579h945e6f9fb70d575d@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 03:50:55PM +0000, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
>
> >> You probably don't hang out in the right place... two people on the
> >> sourceforge zd1211 mailing list recently reported that
> >> MAXIM_NEW_RF=0x08 is just the same as UW2453_RF=0x09 ; and one of
>
> > Or someone can send a patch with a report that it is working for them
> > and I'll just merge it... :-)
>
> The patch and success report was posted to the sourceforge zd1211
> mailing list 2 weeks ago - it is actually in the mailing list archive
> ( http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=zd1211-devs
> , 2nd item from top) I think Daniel Drake and a few of the zd1211rw
> people are on that list . For slightly controversial(?) change like
> this - comparing to just adding vendor+product ids - it is probably
> more appropriate if/when one of them decide to put it in...
This doesn't seem any more contorversial than a USB ID to me...?
> It is likely that 0x08 is just an older 0x09, so it is probably more
> appropriate to put the 0x08 RF id before, rather than after the 0x09
> case as in the posted patch to the zd1211 mailing list.
ACK on the style note.
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <a4c529250902040227g35a375fdu35c2360f0916dba6@mail.gmail.com>
2009-02-04 10:43 ` zd1211rw NEW RF Type Ismael Ojeda Perez
2009-02-04 14:47 ` John W. Linville
2009-02-04 15:17 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-02-04 15:18 ` John W. Linville
2009-02-04 15:50 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-02-04 16:15 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2009-02-04 19:32 ` Ismael Ojeda Perez
2009-02-04 19:43 ` Hin-Tak Leung
2009-02-04 19:47 ` Gábor Stefanik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090204161502.GD3845@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=hintak.leung@gmail.com \
--cc=iojedaperez@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.