From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LV5ds-0004ON-H3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:55:48 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LV5dq-0004MM-Nf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:55:48 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54245 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LV5dq-0004M6-Cx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:55:46 -0500
Received: from hobi.com ([130.94.185.247]:3147)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rickv@hobi.com>) id 1LV5dp-0001Id-Qi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:55:46 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO ricklap.localnet) ([68.23.60.237])
	(envelope-sender <rickv@hobi.com>)
	by 130.94.185.247 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; 5 Feb 2009 14:55:42 -0000
From: Rick Vernam <rickv@hobi.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Cutting a new QEMU release
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:55:40 -0600
References: <1233825194.6637.4.camel@ecrins.fosdick.home.net>
In-Reply-To: <1233825194.6637.4.camel@ecrins.fosdick.home.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200902050855.40685.rickv@hobi.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thursday 05 February 2009 3:13:14 am Steve Fosdick wrote:
> Given the talk of a new release I though I'd try the latest qemu from
> SVN.  At the moment I am being hampered by kqemu-1.4.0pre1 not compiling
> though:
>
>   CC [M]  /usr/src/kqemu-1.4.0pre1/kqemu-linux.o
> /usr/src/kqemu-1.4.0pre1/kqemu-linux.c: In function
> =E2=80=98kqemu_lock_user_page=E2=80=99:
> /usr/src/kqemu-1.4.0pre1/kqemu-linux.c:81: error: dereferencing pointer
> to incomplete type
> /usr/src/kqemu-1.4.0pre1/kqemu-linux.c: In function =E2=80=98kqemu_schedu=
le=E2=80=99:
> /usr/src/kqemu-1.4.0pre1/kqemu-linux.c:194: error: implicit declaration
> of function =E2=80=98need_resched=E2=80=99
> /usr/src/kqemu-1.4.0pre1/kqemu-linux.c:195: error: implicit declaration
> of function =E2=80=98schedule=E2=80=99
> /usr/src/kqemu-1.4.0pre1/kqemu-linux.c:197: error: implicit declaration
> of function =E2=80=98signal_pending=E2=80=99
> make[2]: *** [/usr/src/kqemu-1.4.0pre1/kqemu-linux.o] Error 1
>
> This is with kernel 2.6.28.2. kqemu-1.3.0pre11 seems to compile OK with
> the kernel.  Any ideas?
I, and another, posted about this some time ago.  The solution is a particu=
lar=20
#include somewhere, which I don't recall off the top of my head.
It's in the list somewhere, if you look hard enough.

>
> Regards,
> Steve.