From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] Terminate emulation on memory allocation failure
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:01:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090205120115.GJ2759@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233832126-9046-2-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 01:08:41PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Memory allocation failures are a very rare condition on virtual-memory
> hosts. They are also very difficult to handle correctly (especially in a
> hardware emulation context). Because of this, it is better to gracefully
> terminate emulation rather than executing untested or even unwritten recovery
> code paths.
>
> This patch changes the qemu memory allocation routines to terminate emulation
> if an allocation failure is encountered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
> ---
> qemu-malloc.c | 16 ++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-malloc.c b/qemu-malloc.c
> index dc74efe..1d00f26 100644
> --- a/qemu-malloc.c
> +++ b/qemu-malloc.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,14 @@
> * THE SOFTWARE.
> */
> #include "qemu-common.h"
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +
> +static void *oom_check(void *ptr)
> +{
> + if (ptr == NULL)
> + exit(13);
> + return ptr;
> +}
Will all our atexit handlers cope with OOM too? In particular
we don't want them calling qemu_malloc again, or this becomes
re-entrant. If we want to go down this route, then abort() is
probably safer.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-05 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-05 11:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Unify memory allocation failure handling Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] Terminate emulation on memory allocation failure Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 12:01 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2009-02-05 12:22 ` Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 17:43 ` Ian Jackson
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] block: remove error handling from qemu_malloc() callers Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] audio: " Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] hw: " Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] targets: " Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 11:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] toplevel: " Avi Kivity
2009-02-05 17:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Unify memory allocation failure handling Ian Jackson
2009-02-05 22:07 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-02-06 8:47 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090205120115.GJ2759@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.