All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/ACPI: move _OSC code to pci_root.c
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:49:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090205154936.GC24033@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498AF557.4040601@jp.fujitsu.com>

Hi Kenji-san,

Sorry, I didn't read your patch in detail last time, and only saw
the one wording change that Andrew suggested.

Reading through now, I have a few more suggestions.

> +	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_OSC", &input, &output);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> +		return status;
> +
> +	if (!output.length)
> +		return AE_NULL_OBJECT;
> +
> +	out_obj = output.pointer;
> +	if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Evaluate _OSC returns wrong type\n");

"_OSC evaluation returned wrong type\n"

> +	if (errors) {
> +		if (errors & OSC_REQUEST_ERROR)
> +			printk(KERN_DEBUG "_OSC request fails\n");

"_OSC request failed\n"

> +		if (errors & OSC_INVALID_UUID_ERROR)
> +			printk(KERN_DEBUG "_OSC invalid UUID\n");
> +		if (errors & OSC_INVALID_REVISION_ERROR)
> +			printk(KERN_DEBUG "_OSC invalid revision\n");
> +		if (errors & OSC_CAPABILITIES_MASK_ERROR) {
> +			if (capbuf[OSC_QUERY_TYPE] & OSC_QUERY_ENABLE)
> +				goto out_success;
> +			printk(KERN_DEBUG"Firmware did not grant requested "
> +			       "_OSC control\n");

I prefer to see this message on one line (and break the 80 column
rule) to make grepping easier. But this is a judgement call, and
I'll let you decide.

Thanks.

/ac

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-05 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-05 14:18 [PATCH 0/2] PCI/ACPI: move _OSC code to pci_root.c (v.2) Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-05 14:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI/ACPI: move _OSC code to pci_root.c Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-05 15:49   ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2009-02-05 16:03     ` Moore, Robert
2009-02-06  5:43       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-06 16:14         ` Moore, Robert
2009-02-09  5:20           ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-06  4:30     ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-05 14:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI/ACPI: rename pci_osc_control_set() Kenji Kaneshige
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-09  6:58 [PATCH 0/2] PCI/ACPI: move _OSC code to pci_root.c (v.3) Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-09  6:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI/ACPI: move _OSC code to pci_root.c Kenji Kaneshige
2009-02-09 15:38   ` Alex Chiang
2009-02-13 21:24   ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090205154936.GC24033@ldl.fc.hp.com \
    --to=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=andrew.patterson@hp.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.