From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760007AbZBERbg (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:31:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757343AbZBERbO (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:31:14 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48669 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756147AbZBERbO (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:31:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:30:46 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Renninger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Justin Forbes , Zwane Mwaikambo , "Theodore Ts'o" , Randy Dunlap , Dave Jones , Chuck Wolber , Chris Wedgwood , Michael Krufky , Chuck Ebbert , Domenico Andreoli , Willy Tarreau , Rodrigo Rubira Branco , Jake Edge , Eugene Teo , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Alexey Starikovskiy , Len Brown Subject: Re: [patch 30/41] ACPI EC: Fix regression due to use of uninitialized variable Message-ID: <20090205173046.GB27149@suse.de> References: <20090204184029.881610776@mini.kroah.org> <20090204184648.GE25246@kroah.com> <200902050908.45994.trenn@suse.de> <200902051606.05657.trenn@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200902051606.05657.trenn@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 04:06:02PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Thursday 05 February 2009 09:08:42 Thomas Renninger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wednesday 04 February 2009 19:46:48 Greg KH wrote: > > > 2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us > > > know. > > Does this one patch cleanly in 2.6.27-stable? > > I had it on my list, but this seem to have been introduced after > > 2.6.27 and I thought I removed this one again? > > Or this is a follow up of another fix that should go in? > Yes this got in by another patch. > The huge "make ACPI integer 64 bit aware" one. Which looked like > it could fix really nasty bugs and is safe due to only long to long long > conversions. But maybe this wasn't such a good idea, as exported > kernel functions change from long to long long... That's ok, there is no "stable abi" requirement for the -stable releases. thanks, greg k-h