From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: tom.leiming@gmail.com, kay.sievers@vrfy.org,
cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe_done(v3)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:08:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090205180856.GA20805@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090204170858.2d07b546@infradead.org>
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 05:08:58PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:08:51 -0800
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:52:24AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:35 +0800
> > > tom.leiming@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > This patch adds a function : driver_wait_probe_done,
> > > > which waits on condition of probing done to replace
> > > > polling for driver_probe_done in fs initialization.
> > > >
> > > > There is no better way to avoid polling for
> > > > driver_probe_done _and_ existence of the root device,
> > > > so we does not replace the driver_probe_done with
> > > > driver_wait_probe_done in such special case.
> > > >
> > > > Removing polling in fs initialization may lead to
> > > > a faster boot.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > ok this one will work fine ;)
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > thanks for fixing this up
> > > (it will clash with the patch that moves this to one place, but the
> > > same cleanup can be done there)
> >
> > What patch is that? Should i be taking this? Or are they in some
> > other tree?
>
> it's the suspend-resume regression fixes that either you already have
> or that raphael sent to you
Hm, ok, I don't see any left in my tree, or queue, so perhaps someone
might want to resend them to me?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-05 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-30 12:48 [PATCH] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe_done(v3) tom.leiming
2009-01-30 13:31 ` Cornelia Huck
2009-01-30 14:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-04 23:08 ` Greg KH
2009-02-05 1:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-05 18:08 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-02-17 1:14 ` Ming Lei
2009-02-17 3:19 ` Greg KH
2009-02-17 4:07 ` Ming Lei
2009-02-17 4:12 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090205180856.GA20805@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.