From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dan.j.williams@intel.com
Cc: anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp, maciej.sosnowski@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net_dma: call dmaengine_get only if NET_DMA enabled
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:05:31 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206.220531.81492830.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498D241F.4080005@intel.com>
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 23:03:11 -0700
> David Miller wrote:
> > From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> > Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:29:10 -0800 (PST)
> >
> >> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:52:35 -0700
> >>
> >>> Yes, it has been on the todo list for a while, but I eventually want
> >>> the net case to look more like the raid case. I.e. have one code path
> >>> that picks async versus sync at runtime, with the option to compile
> >>> out async support with header file ifdefs only.
> >> And how does any of that get us any closer to a fix right now
> >> for this problem that doesn't require an ifdef?
> >>
> >> Someone please work on this.
> > I guess that'd end up being me....
>
> Not necessarily, you did snap me back into reality with that comment.
>
> > How about something like this?
>
> Looks good.
Ok, I'll add this to net-2.6 then, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-07 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-06 16:02 [PATCH] net_dma: call dmaengine_get only if NET_DMA enabled Atsushi Nemoto
2009-02-06 21:15 ` Dan Williams
2009-02-06 22:09 ` David Miller
2009-02-06 22:52 ` Dan Williams
2009-02-07 3:29 ` David Miller
2009-02-07 5:55 ` David Miller
2009-02-07 6:03 ` Dan Williams
2009-02-07 6:05 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090206.220531.81492830.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.sosnowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.