From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/17] libfc: check for err when recv and state is incorrect
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:56:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206185621.26188.50192.stgit@fritz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206185548.26188.51580.stgit@fritz>
If we've just created an interface and the an rport is
logging in we may have a request on the wire (say PRLI).
If we destroy the interface, we'll go through each rport
on the disc->rports list and set each rport's state to NONE.
Then the lport will reset the EM. The EM reset will send a
CLOSED event to the prli_resp() handler which will notice
that the state != PRLI. In this case it frees the frame
pointer, decrements the refcount and unlocks the rport.
The problem is that there isn't a frame in this case. It's
just a pointer with an embedded error code. The free causes
an Oops.
This patch moves the error checking to be before the state
checking.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c | 30 ++++++++++++-------------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
index 60ac36f..7dd433c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c
@@ -1031,17 +1031,17 @@ static void fc_lport_rft_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
FC_DEBUG_LPORT("Received a RFT_ID response\n");
+ if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
+ fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RFT_ID) {
FC_DBG("Received a RFT_ID response, but in state %s\n",
fc_lport_state(lport));
goto out;
}
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
@@ -1083,17 +1083,17 @@ static void fc_lport_rpn_id_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
FC_DEBUG_LPORT("Received a RPN_ID response\n");
+ if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
+ fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_RPN_ID) {
FC_DBG("Received a RPN_ID response, but in state %s\n",
fc_lport_state(lport));
goto out;
}
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
ct = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*ct));
if (fh && ct && fh->fh_type == FC_TYPE_CT &&
@@ -1133,17 +1133,17 @@ static void fc_lport_scr_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
FC_DEBUG_LPORT("Received a SCR response\n");
+ if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
+ fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_SCR) {
FC_DBG("Received a SCR response, but in state %s\n",
fc_lport_state(lport));
goto out;
}
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
op = fc_frame_payload_op(fp);
if (op == ELS_LS_ACC)
fc_lport_enter_ready(lport);
@@ -1359,17 +1359,17 @@ static void fc_lport_logo_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
FC_DEBUG_LPORT("Received a LOGO response\n");
+ if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
+ fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_LOGO) {
FC_DBG("Received a LOGO response, but in state %s\n",
fc_lport_state(lport));
goto out;
}
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
op = fc_frame_payload_op(fp);
if (op == ELS_LS_ACC)
fc_lport_enter_reset(lport);
@@ -1443,17 +1443,17 @@ static void fc_lport_flogi_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
FC_DEBUG_LPORT("Received a FLOGI response\n");
+ if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
+ fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
if (lport->state != LPORT_ST_FLOGI) {
FC_DBG("Received a FLOGI response, but in state %s\n",
fc_lport_state(lport));
goto out;
}
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_lport_error(lport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
fh = fc_frame_header_get(fp);
did = ntoh24(fh->fh_d_id);
if (fc_frame_payload_op(fp) == ELS_LS_ACC && did != 0) {
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
index 81b3ca1..4f23a9b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c
@@ -505,17 +505,17 @@ static void fc_rport_plogi_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
FC_DEBUG_RPORT("Received a PLOGI response from port (%6x)\n",
rport->port_id);
+ if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
+ fc_rport_error_retry(rport, fp);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
if (rdata->rp_state != RPORT_ST_PLOGI) {
FC_DBG("Received a PLOGI response, but in state %s\n",
fc_rport_state(rport));
goto out;
}
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_rport_error_retry(rport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
op = fc_frame_payload_op(fp);
if (op == ELS_LS_ACC &&
(plp = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*plp))) != NULL) {
@@ -614,17 +614,17 @@ static void fc_rport_prli_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
FC_DEBUG_RPORT("Received a PRLI response from port (%6x)\n",
rport->port_id);
+ if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
+ fc_rport_error_retry(rport, fp);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
if (rdata->rp_state != RPORT_ST_PRLI) {
FC_DBG("Received a PRLI response, but in state %s\n",
fc_rport_state(rport));
goto out;
}
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_rport_error_retry(rport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
op = fc_frame_payload_op(fp);
if (op == ELS_LS_ACC) {
pp = fc_frame_payload_get(fp, sizeof(*pp));
@@ -764,17 +764,17 @@ static void fc_rport_rtv_resp(struct fc_seq *sp, struct fc_frame *fp,
FC_DEBUG_RPORT("Received a RTV response from port (%6x)\n",
rport->port_id);
+ if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
+ fc_rport_error(rport, fp);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
if (rdata->rp_state != RPORT_ST_RTV) {
FC_DBG("Received a RTV response, but in state %s\n",
fc_rport_state(rport));
goto out;
}
- if (IS_ERR(fp)) {
- fc_rport_error(rport, fp);
- goto err;
- }
-
op = fc_frame_payload_op(fp);
if (op == ELS_LS_ACC) {
struct fc_els_rtv_acc *rtv;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-06 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-06 18:55 [PATCH 00/17] Open-FCoE Updates Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:55 ` [PATCH 01/17] libfc: fixed a read IO data integrity issue when a IO data frame lost Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:55 ` [PATCH 02/17] fcoe: exch mgr is freed while lport still retrying sequences Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:56 ` [PATCH 03/17] libfc: Don't violate transport template for rogue port creation Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:56 ` [PATCH 04/17] libfc: correct RPORT_TO_PRIV usage Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:56 ` [PATCH 05/17] libfc: rename rp to rdata in fc_disc_new_target() Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:56 ` Robert Love [this message]
2009-02-06 18:56 ` [PATCH 07/17] fcoe: runtime debugging with debug_logging module parameter Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:56 ` [PATCH 08/17] fcoe: Logging review changes Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:56 ` [PATCH 09/17] libfc: runtime debugging with debug_logging module parameter Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:56 ` [PATCH 10/17] libfc: Logging review changes Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:56 ` [PATCH 11/17] libfc: Cleanup libfc_function_template comments Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:56 ` [PATCH 12/17] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:56 ` [PATCH 13/17] libfc, fcoe: Cleanup function formatting and minor typos Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 14/17] libfc, fcoe: Remove unnecessary cast by removing inline wrapper Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 15/17] fcoe: Use setup_timer() and mod_timer() Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 16/17] fcoe: Correct fcoe_transports initialization vs. registration Robert Love
2009-02-06 18:57 ` [PATCH 17/17] [SCSI] fcoe: fix kfree(skb) Robert Love
2009-02-26 2:49 ` [PATCH 00/17] Open-FCoE Updates Mike Christie
2009-02-26 18:29 ` Robert Love
2009-02-26 19:05 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-26 19:54 ` Love, Robert W
2009-03-02 22:24 ` Love, Robert W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090206185621.26188.50192.stgit@fritz \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.