From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][v7] Container-init signal semantics Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 13:20:22 -0800 Message-ID: <20090207212022.GA25353@us.ibm.com> References: <20090117202638.GA11825@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090117202638.GA11825@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: oleg@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, roland@redhat.com, bastian@waldi.eu.org Cc: daniel@hozac.com, xemul@openvz.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Sukadev Bhattiprolu [sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote: | Patches in this set: | | [PATCH 1/7] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions | [PATCH 2/7] Protect init from unwanted signals more | [PATCH 3/7] Add from_ancestor_ns parameter to send_signal() | [PATCH 4/7] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals | [PATCH 5/7] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals | [PATCH 6/7] SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary | [PATCH 7/7] proc: Show SIG_DFL signals to init as "ignored" signals Roland, Eric, Daniel, Pavel Any comments on this patchset ? We are not sure about patch 7, but should I send the rest to Andrew ? Sukadev