All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 12680] New: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt.
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:05:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090209130536.9a7a87cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-12680-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>


(switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).

On Mon,  9 Feb 2009 09:12:59 -0800 (PST)
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:

> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12680
> 
>            Summary: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in
>                     probing on modules insertion attempt.
>            Product: Drivers
>            Version: 2.5
>      KernelVersion: Any 2.6.29 release candidate
>           Platform: All
>         OS/Version: Linux
>               Tree: Mainline
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P1
>          Component: Other
>         AssignedTo: drivers_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org

hm, we don't seem to have a bugzilla category for crypto.

>         ReportedBy: v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr
> 
> 
> Latest working kernel version: 2.6.28.4
> Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.29-rc1

I'll ask Rafael to track this as a post-2.6.28 regression.

> Distribution:
> Hardware Environment: IA32 i686 Athlon model 10
> Software Environment: Pristine kernel 2.6.29-rc4-git1 + Debian Lenny/Sid
> Problem Description: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in
> probing on modules insertion attempt:
> 
>   I can't say whether this abnormally long probe delay occurs on "padlock_aes"
> or "padlock_sha" module insertion attempt or both.
> 
>   I do not have such hardware indeed.
> 
> I've never observed this problem so far with Linux version <= 2.6.28.4 .
> 
> Steps to reproduce:
> 
> Power-on your system ;-)
> 
> In hope my report will prove useful.
> 

Neither of those drivers have changed in six months, so the breakage
must be elsewhere.

I guess this should be easy for others to reproduce.

How long is the "long" delay?

Please do this:

	add "log_buf_len=1M" to the kernel boot command line
	reboot

	dmesg -n 8
	modprobe padlock_aes &
	sleep 1
	echo t > /prog/sysrq-trigger
	dmesg -s 1000000 > foo

and then send us `foo'.  Pleas avoid wordwrapping it.

This will permit us to see where `modprobe' is getting stuck.

Thanks.


       reply	other threads:[~2009-02-09 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-12680-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2009-02-09 21:05 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-09 21:59   ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 12680] New: Not having a VIA PadLock hardware incurs a long delay in probing on modules insertion attempt Valentin QUEQUET
     [not found]   ` <4992FC7E.3010207@orange.fr>
2009-02-11 17:16     ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-11 19:28       ` Milan Broz
2009-02-11 20:55         ` [dm-devel] " Valentin QUEQUET

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090209130536.9a7a87cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=v.quequet-techniques@orange.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.