From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Finn Arne Gangstad Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Support "\" in non-wildcard exclusion entries Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:23:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20090210172318.GA11384@pvv.org> References: <20090210121149.GA1226@pvv.org> <20090210125800.GA14800@pvv.org> <20090210142017.GA16478@pvv.org> <20090210143742.GB16478@pvv.org> <7vab8upb5v.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v7i3ynt1z.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 10 18:24:58 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LWwLs-0006MU-6K for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:24:52 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753193AbZBJRXZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:23:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753188AbZBJRXY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:23:24 -0500 Received: from decibel.pvv.ntnu.no ([129.241.210.179]:51498 "EHLO decibel.pvv.ntnu.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752341AbZBJRXY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:23:24 -0500 Received: from finnag by decibel.pvv.ntnu.no with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LWwKN-0008EL-3X; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:23:19 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v7i3ynt1z.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 08:41:12AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > Oh, by the way, do we really want to add a new test script? I am > wondering why the test is not an update to an existing test for the > exclusion feature, such as t/t3001-ls-files-others-exclude.sh I really did not want to add a new test script, but extending 3001 with this test seemed to make the test slightly more opaque. I can try adding it to 3001 and see what it ends up looking like. - Finn Arne