Re: RFC: Flat directory for notes, or fan-out? Both!

[Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 686 bytes --]

Thomas Rast wrote:
> Sure, one problem is that the index reading code is inherently written
> for a single index state.  However, all notes consumers I can
> currently think of (show, log, anything that displays commit messages)
> do not have to access the "real" index.
[...]
> At a (*very*) cursory glance at read-cache.c, it seems that there is
> even support for having several index structures in memory at once,
> making this easy.  And it looks like reading the cache is more or less
> memcpy() if xmmap() is fast (Windows would suffer once again).

Note to self: do not write mail on bus, then pick up later at home.

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]