From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: why does mkfs.xfs complain here?
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:13:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902111513.00473@zmi.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4992D3B7.7060101@sandeen.net>
On Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > # mkfs.xfs -f -L ws1phptmp -b size=4096 -d
> > su=64k,sw=4,agsize=65262b -i attr=2 -l lazy-count=1,su=65536
> > /dev/sdf1 log stripe unit specified, using v2 logs
> > agsize rounded to 65264, swidth = 64
> > meta-data=/dev/sdf1 isize=256 agcount=4,
> > agsize=65264 blks = sectsz=512 attr=2
> > data = bsize=4096 blocks=261048,
> > imaxpct=25 = sunit=16 swidth=64 blks,
> > unwritten=1 naming =version 2 bsize=4096
> > log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=1200,
> > version=2 = sectsz=512 sunit=16 blks,
> > lazy-count=1 realtime =none extsz=4096
> > blocks=0, rtextents=0
> >
> > So no problem using agsize instead agcount, where agcount
> > complained about group size = 65262, which I then used without
> > problem?
>
> and then it chose 65264 instead.
>
> all this is a little messy in mkfs.xfs, I suppose you've found a
> bug....
Good, I wasn't sure if it's me not understanding it. :-)
Also, the line
agsize rounded to 65264, swidth = 64
should be changed to use units:
agsize rounded to 65264b, swidth = 64k
and so should all other values also I guess. It would be good at least,
as the current mixture is confusing:
imaxpct=25 = sunit=16 swidth=64 blks,
The "pct" is clear, but could have "%", swidth has the units "blks", but
what is "sunit" is only clear if you read the man page.
Yes, somewhat messy, maybe there can be a full cleanup. :-)
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-11 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-11 12:10 why does mkfs.xfs complain here? Michael Monnerie
2009-02-11 13:33 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-02-11 14:13 ` Michael Monnerie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902111513.00473@zmi.at \
--to=michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.