On (26/01/09 08:24), Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-25 at 23:49 -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > * These funtions are provided by C libraries like uclibc
> >         Declaring them static here causes static not static declaration
> >         issues reported by gcc.
> > [...]
> > + #ifdef __GLIBC__
> > +-static size_t strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t size)
> > ++size_t strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t size)
> > + {
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to change that "#ifdef __GLIBC__" to something
> more appropriate?  With your change it looks like you will still get
> useless copies of these functions in the resulting binaries.

here is a different patch.