All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [6609] Parse full PCI device addresses (Markus Armbruster)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:56:05 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090212155605.GA18654@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902121539.26892.paul@codesourcery.com>

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:39:26PM +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> > This code parses full PCI device addresses.  It then rejects domains
> > other than zero, because these are not supported in QEMU.
> >...
> > + * Parse [[<domain>:]<bus>:]<slot>, return -1 on error
> > + */
> > +static int pci_parse_devaddr(const char *addr, int *domp, int *busp,
> > unsigned *slotp) +{
> 
> If we're rejecting nonzero domains then having the parse routine return a 
> domain value seems wrong. It's just going to make it harder to verify correct 
> operation when domains are implemented.

+    /* Note: QEMU doesn't implement domains other than 0 */
+    if (dom != 0 || pci_find_bus(bus) == NULL) {
+       fprintf(stderr, "PCI device address %s not supported", addr);
+       return -1;
+    }

+    if (!strcmp(devaddr, "auto")) {
+        *domp = *busp = 0;
+        *slotp = -1;
+        /* want to support dom/bus auto-assign at some point */
+        return 0;
+    }

We return domain 0. I considered domain 0 as implicit at the moment, is
that wrong?

I can't see where you're getting at.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-12 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-11 15:21 [Qemu-devel] [6609] Parse full PCI device addresses (Markus Armbruster) Anthony Liguori
2009-02-12 15:39 ` Paul Brook
2009-02-12 15:56   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2009-02-12 16:18     ` Paul Brook
2009-02-12 18:27       ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090212155605.GA18654@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.