From: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Bonnie++ run with RAID-1 on a single SSD (2.6.29-rc4-224-g4b6136c)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 23:31:09 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902132331.12928.chris@csamuel.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2433 bytes --]
Hi folks,
For people who might be interested, here is how btrfs performs
with two partitions on a single SSD drive in a RAID-1 mirror.
This is on a Dell E4200 with Core 2 Duo U9300 (1.2GHz), 2GB RAM
and a Samsung SSD (128GB Thin uSATA SSD).
Version 1.03c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
sys26 2G 28299 17 18633 12 85702 29 3094 18
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 7513 99 +++++ +++ 5140 98 3964 67 +++++ +++ 5652 99
sys26,2G,,,28299,17,18633,12,,,85702,29,3093.9,18,16,7513,99,+++++,+++,5140,98,3964,67,+++++,+++,5652,99
real 3m51.883s
user 0m0.360s
sys 0m46.099s
I'd previously blogged a test with 2.6.29-rc2 and there's no
real difference between the two runs.
http://www.csamuel.org/2009/01/04/btrfs-raid1-benchmark-on-dell-e4200-with-128gb-ssd
For a comparison, here is XFS on a single partition:
Version 1.03c ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
sys26 2G 62075 19 36634 16 92023 26 1432 12
------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
-Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
16 585 13 +++++ +++ 578 5 538 11 +++++ +++ 417 5
sys26,2G,,,62075,19,36634,16,,,92023,26,1431.8,12,16,585,13,+++++,+++,578,5,538,11,+++++,+++,417,5
real 4m10.987s
user 0m0.404s
sys 0m33.602s
Block I/O is faster, but btrfs hammers it for metadata operations, an
order of magnitude faster!
cheers,
Chris
--
Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC
This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic.
For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 481 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2009-02-13 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-13 12:31 Chris Samuel [this message]
2009-02-13 13:27 ` Bonnie++ run with RAID-1 on a single SSD (2.6.29-rc4-224-g4b6136c) Sander
2009-02-13 14:26 ` Chris Mason
2009-03-24 10:41 ` Chris Samuel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902132331.12928.chris@csamuel.org \
--to=chris@csamuel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.