From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tino Keitel Subject: Re: [Bug #12401] 2.6.28 regression: xbacklight broken on ThinkPad X61s Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:16:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20090215221647.GA15392@dose.home.local> References: <20090215134409.GC21670@srcf.ucam.org> <200902151538.29766.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200902151538.29766.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Matthew Garrett , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andi Kleen , Len Brown , Thomas Renninger , Zhang Rui On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 15:38:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday 15 February 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > This one sounded like a configuration error. I think if it works without DRI in 2.6.27 and doesn't work in 2.6.28, it isn't a configuration error, but a real regression. Regards, Tino From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754841AbZBOWRB (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:17:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752703AbZBOWQw (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:16:52 -0500 Received: from eazy.amigager.de ([213.239.192.238]:53725 "EHLO eazy.amigager.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752691AbZBOWQv (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:16:51 -0500 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:16:47 +0100 From: Tino Keitel To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Matthew Garrett , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andi Kleen , Len Brown , Thomas Renninger , Zhang Rui Subject: Re: [Bug #12401] 2.6.28 regression: xbacklight broken on ThinkPad X61s Message-ID: <20090215221647.GA15392@dose.home.local> Mail-Followup-To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Matthew Garrett , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Andi Kleen , Len Brown , Thomas Renninger , Zhang Rui References: <20090215134409.GC21670@srcf.ucam.org> <200902151538.29766.rjw@sisk.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200902151538.29766.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 15:38:28 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday 15 February 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > This one sounded like a configuration error. I think if it works without DRI in 2.6.27 and doesn't work in 2.6.28, it isn't a configuration error, but a real regression. Regards, Tino