From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [206.46.173.7] (helo=vms173007pub.verizon.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LZYrf-0003ID-K2 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:56:31 +0100 Received: from gandalf.denix.org ([71.251.57.220]) by vms173007.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KF800GZ5FMPBSHB@vms173007.mailsrvcs.net> for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:54:26 -0600 (CST) Received: by gandalf.denix.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AFE476B83B5; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:54:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:54:24 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-id: <20090217225424.GC9047@denix.org> References: <20090217022412.GA3240@denix.org> MIME-version: 1.0 In-reply-to: <20090217022412.GA3240@denix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: Re: Enterprise kills BBMASK X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:56:31 -0000 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:24:12PM -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > Sorry for the "sensational" subject... :) > > Basically, some time back I noticed that BBMASK stopped working. I didn't have > time to look into it, until today. One of Mickey's commits broke the tree, > because bunch of recipes require a missing .inc file, leading to Bitbake > parsing failure. > > Now, trying to set BBMASK leads to nothing. The problem is with > conf/enterprise.conf, which re-sets it to empty if ENTERPRISE_DISTRO is not > set. So, not matter what you set BBMASK to in your local.conf, it ends up > being empty. Unfortunately, it can't be done with "+=", as it has to be a > regular expression... > > Any ideas how to fix it? So, does it mean nobody cares that BBMASK is broken? Or maybe I didn't explain the problem clearly enough the first time? :) -- Denys