From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1754197AbZBRSUn@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754197AbZBRSUn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:20:43 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753970AbZBRSU3
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:20:29 -0500
Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:33787 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753246AbZBRSU2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:20:28 -0500
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:20:15 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: add some missing section markers
Message-ID: <20090218182015.GB26802@elte.hu>
References: <499B23F2.1080802@goop.org> <20090218000745.GC12714@elte.hu> <499B7F74.2000105@goop.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <499B7F74.2000105@goop.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3
	-1.5 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>>
>>   
>>> early_acpi_os_unmap_memory() is an __init function, and  
>>> acpi_os_unmap_memory() is allowed to access an __init function until 
>>> acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap is set up.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
>>>     
>>
>> Note, this is modified by tip:x86/acpi, so if Len applies it to the 
>> ACPI tree we'll generate conflicts. Since the problem itself has been 
>> generated by the 6 commits in tip:x86/acpi, if Len is fine with it i'd 
>> like to apply your fix there.
>
> Sorry, I'd forgotten what path those patches were taking; I 
> just blindly applied the "ACPI=Len" pattern.

That was the correct pattern to apply in any case, as it 
modifies drivers/acpi/.

	Ingo