From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Young Subject: Re: [RFA] RX flags Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:04:16 -0600 Message-ID: <20090219020416.GM17342@ojctech.com> References: <1234172982.4175.184.camel@johannes.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1234172982.4175.184.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org> Sender: radiotap-owner-sUITvd46vNxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org To: radiotap List-Id: radiotap@radiotap.org On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:00:53PM -0600, Johannes Berg wrote: > > --=-lUysiMTCgz5FaPq+jp+v > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > This is a request for adoption of the following new radiotap features: > > * a new flag in the "flags" field (field 1): > - bad FCS > * the new "RX flags" field (field 14), currently containing the > following flag: > - bad PLCP Thanks for bringing the proposal, Johannes. I will update NetBSD to agree with these field definitions, if their are not objections in the timeline you have described: > Barring objections, I will repost the normative changes on in two weeks > time (Feb 23.) to be adopted on March 2, at which point I will make the > changes to the radiotap.org website and post the Linux patch for > inclusion. AFAIK, your definitions are compatible with FreeBSD, too, which is a big plus to my mind. Dave -- David Young OJC Technologies dyoung-eZodSLrBbDpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933