All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Definition of BUG on x86
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:41:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090219164104.GA20941@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <499D8A0C.5030908@goop.org>


* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Well, the important question is thatGCC will optimize out whatever 
>> comes after the __builtin_trap(), right? To guarantee an assert we can 
>> do something like:
>>
>>  	__builtin_trap();
>> 	panic("should never get here");
>>
>> to guarantee a message. (But realistically GCC will at most generate a 
>> build error.)
>
> Ah, right, I remember the problem.  There's no guaranteed way 
> of getting the address of the ud2a instruction __builtin_trap 
> generates to put it into the bug table.

hm, indeed.

So that 2 byte overhead will be there for now, until gcc (or 
some other compiler) is improved.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-19 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1234975856.15053.16.camel@nathan.suse.cz>
     [not found] ` <499C4786.5010504@goop.org>
2009-02-19 11:40   ` Definition of BUG on x86 Petr Tesarik
2009-02-19 12:10     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 12:19       ` Petr Tesarik
2009-02-19 12:22         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 12:38           ` Petr Tesarik
2009-02-19 12:47             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 13:02               ` Petr Tesarik
2009-02-19 14:49                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 15:32                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-19 15:35                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 16:11                       ` Petr Tesarik
2009-02-19 16:16                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 16:34                           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-19 16:41                             ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-19 20:07                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-19 20:26                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-19 16:55                           ` Petr Tesarik
2009-02-19 16:32                       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-02-19 18:38     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090219164104.GA20941@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.