Re: [lm-sensors] Intel DG45FC

From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Intel DG45FC
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:11:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090220101151.79e0482e@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7bccedf10809181658o18aa47bbt46480ca2a67b1ac9@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Anthony,

On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:45:10 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:38:00 -0800, Anthony Arobone wrote:
> > # isadump 0x2e 0x2f 8
> > WARNING! Running this program can cause system crashes, data loss and worse!
> > I will probe address register 0x2e and data register 0x2f.
> > Probing bank 8 using bank register 0x07.
> > Continue? [Y/n] y
> >      0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f
> > 00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 41
> > 20: f1 01 00 00 01 01 00 91 00 11 2e 00 00 10 00 00
> > 30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 40: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 50: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 60: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 70: 00 03 00 00 04 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > c0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > d0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > f0: 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 
> OK, so as expected, the logical device with the hardware monitoring
> features is disabled. If you look at ticket #2182 starting at:
> http://www.lm-sensors.org/ticket/2182#comment:13
> 
> You'll see what we tried with the other user to enable the logical
> device and see if it "woke up" the "emulated" LM96000. It did not work
> for him, but feel free to try too and see if it helps on your board:
> 
> isaset -y 0x2e 0x2f 0x07 8
> isaset -y 0x2e 0x2f 0x60 0x02
> isaset -y 0x2e 0x2f 0x61 0x90
> isaset -y 0x2e 0x2f 0x30 1
> 
> (After checking in /proc/ioports that there's nothing at 0x290 on your
> system.) Then:
> 
> rmmod lm85
> modprobe lm85

Did you ever try this?

> That being said, I'm not holding my breath. Maybe your system has the
> same chip variant (WPCD377i) without the hardware monitoring feature
> and that's the reason why all the readings are 0 and the actual
> monitoring is done by the Intel ICH chip.

Can you please look at your board (physically) and search for the
Super-I/O chip? This should be one of:

PC8374L
WPCD374L
WPCD376I
WPCD377I

I would like to know which one you have.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors