From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:55:00 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] Intel DQ45CB motherboard and weird sensors output Message-Id: <20090220145500.080bf83e@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <499372A3.6080803@frugalware.org> In-Reply-To: <499372A3.6080803@frugalware.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:20:05 +0100, Gabriel C wrote: > Gabriel C wrote: > > > Jean Delvare wrote: > >> OK, thanks for reporting. I have just committed a fix to sensors-detect > >> so that it will differentiate between LM96000/PC8374L (have sensors) > >> and WPCD377I (no sensors) on the SMBus. Please give it a try: > >> http://www.lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk/prog/detect/sensors-detect > > > > > > Thanks , I will test when I'm home and report back. > > It does work for me , the new output is : > > ... > > Probing for `National Semiconductor LM96000 or PC8374L'... No > ... > > Probing for `Winbond WPCD377I'... Yes > (confidence 7, not a hardware monitoring chip) As expected. Thanks for reporting. > .. > > Jean it is possible these chips have something to do with Intel's QST ? No, they do not. The idea (as far as I understand it) is that these boards have Super-I/O chips with reduced features (no hardware monitoring) because the south bridge (ICH8+) has QST support. So you need AMT/QST support for hardware monitoring features. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors