Re: Timer instability

[Lennart Poettering <mznyfn@0pointer.de>]

On Mon, 23.02.09 03:42, Lennart Poettering (mznyfn@0pointer.de) wrote:

> 
> On Sun, 22.02.09 04:14, Lennart Poettering (mznyfn@0pointer.de) wrote:
> 
> > I wrote this little test to track down all kinds of timer issues: it
> > opens and sets up a sound device. Then it will constantly query
> > _avail(), _delay() and _htstamp() in a busy loop writing a single
> > sample at a time. The three values are then printed along with a
> > system timestamp. The data generated like this can be opened in
> > gnumeric and a nice graph be drawn.
> 
> Hmm, did some more testing with this tool on other cards:
> 
> On es1969 snd_pcm_avail() sometimes returns values like
> 1073728596 samples. This smells a lot like an overflow given that this
> times four (i.e. the sample size in bytes) is near to 2^32.

[...]

> Here's an output of this tool for an emu10k1 card:

[...]

This is the end of the tool's output for HDA AD1989B:

http://fpaste.org/paste/4240

The device is completely filled up (i.e. avail is 0, delay is 4416)
and then after 2us suddenly the avail jumps to 4971973988617027465 and
the delay to -4971973988617023049.

Smells like an integer overflow to me ...

Hmm, for now my little testing experiment I've now found es1969,
ens1371, intel8x0, snd-emu10k1 and some intel-hda to have unreliable
_avail() or _delay().

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering                        Red Hat, Inc.
lennart [at] poettering [dot] net         ICQ# 11060553
http://0pointer.net/lennart/           GnuPG 0x1A015CC4