From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel building procedure changed?
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:14:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090223081429.GB29898@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090223074837.GA29898@localhost>
[Cyrill Gorcunov - Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:48:37AM +0300]
...
| Sam, it seems I never paid attention on Makefile
| rules before. Which means -- I don't know if kernel
| build procedure should behave like it do now.
|
| We have the following rule (arch/x86/kernel/Makefile)
|
| extra-y := head_$(BITS).o head$(BITS).o head.o init_task.o
| vmlinux.lds
|
| Does it mean that any obj-y targets should be built before
| extra-y? If "yes" -- all is fine and works well and I'm just
| noising here (sorry for that).
|
| To be precise -- I don't remember how it worked before :)
| I mean it's possible that my previous workflow was:
|
| 1) build whole kernel by "make"
| 2) modify head_64.S
| 3) run "make arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o"
|
| So I will try to repeat these 3 points and report.
|
| - Cyrill -
Ok, I just finished building the whole kernel.
And now building this particular single file is
passed fine.
---
cyrill@lenovo linux-2.6.git $ make
...
Root device is (8, 5)
Setup is 11388 bytes (padded to 11776 bytes).
System is 2819 kB
CRC 3cf5b442
Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#13)
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 1 modules
CC drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.mod.o
LD [M] drivers/scsi/scsi_wait_scan.ko
cyrill@lenovo linux-2.6.git $ patch -p1 < patches/x86-remove-balign
patching file arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
cyrill@lenovo linux-2.6.git $ make arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
UPD include/linux/utsrelease.h
SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC init/version.o
LD init/built-in.o
AS arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syscall-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-sysenter-syms.lds
VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
LD arch/x86/vdso/built-in.o
CC kernel/trace/trace.o
LD kernel/trace/built-in.o
CC kernel/module.o
CC kernel/kexec.o
LD kernel/built-in.o
---
So all builds fine Sam. But frankly I don't understand why
I have to build the whole kernel to be able to compile
head_64.S.
- Cyrill -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-23 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-22 22:07 kernel building procedure changed? Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-22 22:13 ` Jesper Juhl
2009-02-22 22:16 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-22 22:27 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-22 23:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-22 23:15 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-23 7:48 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-02-23 8:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-02-22 22:28 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090223081429.GB29898@localhost \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.