From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754899AbZBXD5e (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:57:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752472AbZBXD5Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:57:25 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:42337 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751711AbZBXD5Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:57:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:57:17 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Cc: , Subject: Re: mmotm 2009-02-20-15-52 uploaded (via-sdmmc) Message-Id: <20090223195717.967f860f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <499F869C.9000208@oracle.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:44:35 +0800 wrote: > Any comment on this? Should I send the whole v5 patch to linux-kernel mail-list? Or just patch for this issue? Thanks. It doesn't matter a lot really. If you send a full patch I'll turn it into a delta so I can see what you did. But as I'm probably the only person who read the original patch, I'm the only one who will be interested in seeing the delta ;) So please do whatever is convenient.