From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1758169AbZBXDPx@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758169AbZBXDPx (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:15:53 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757877AbZBXDNa
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:13:30 -0500
Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:33246 "EHLO ozlabs.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1757883AbZBXDN3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:13:29 -0500
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: What made this bug report better? (was Re: Poking ieee80211_default_rc_algo causes kernel lockups)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:43:22 +1030
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.27-11-generic; KDE/4.2.0; i686; ; )
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <slrngpgfil.5gc.sitsofe@sitsofe.eeepc.localdomain> <200902171007.28257.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20090220102705.GA2884@silver.sucs.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090220102705.GA2884@silver.sucs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200902241343.22762.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Friday 20 February 2009 20:57:05 Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> What happened this time that made things succesful? Was the original
> mail too big? Did it not make it to the list?

Frederic was the difference; he pulled me in by CC'ing me, once he figured
out it was my bug.

Cheers,
Rusty.