From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
To: pat-lkml <pat-lkml@erley.org>
Cc: Jouni Malinen <jouni.malinen@atheros.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Add module parameter to disable hardware crypto
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:07:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090224150710.GA1419@jm.kir.nu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A40320.1040902@erley.org>
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:24:32AM -0500, pat-lkml wrote:
> With this patch, and nohwcrypt=1, I get the following in hostapd (this
> system runs as an access point) when I try to associate with a client.
>
> I can't say whether this is a hostapd problem or an ath9k problem yet,
> but it's a different behavior than with nohwcrypt=0 or without this
> patch. With this patch, wpa2 works perfectly, as without it, as well
> as wep working perfectly.
Are you saying that you get different behavior from hostapd when
comparing nohwcrypt=0 and nohwcrypt=1 (i.e., no changes in the driver
code, just the module parameter change)?
> I wouldn't call this report a 'ACK/NACK' report as it has caused no
> new problems, nor fixed any old problems. Unfortunately I don't have
> a log around of the old behavior right now, for comparison. I just
> wanted to report what I've found based on this patch.
> wlan0: STA 00:1f:a7:70:2d:8d WPA: sending 1/4 msg of 4-Way Handshake
> wlan0: STA 00:1f:a7:70:2d:8d WPA: EAPOL-Key timeout
> wlan0: STA 00:1f:a7:70:2d:8d WPA: sending 1/4 msg of 4-Way Handshake
> wlan0: STA 00:1f:a7:70:2d:8d WPA: EAPOL-Key timeout
> wlan0: STA 00:1f:a7:70:2d:8d WPA: sending 1/4 msg of 4-Way Handshake
> wlan0: STA 00:1f:a7:70:2d:8d WPA: received EAPOL-Key frame (2/4 Pairwise)
> wlan0: STA 00:1f:a7:70:2d:8d WPA: invalid MIC in msg 2/4 of 4-Way Handshake
> wlan0: STA 00:1f:a7:70:2d:8d WPA: received EAPOL-Key 2/4 Pairwise with unexpected replay counter
> wlan0: STA 00:1f:a7:70:2d:8d WPA: received EAPOL-Key 2/4 Pairwise with unexpected replay counter
> wlan0: STA 00:1f:a7:70:2d:8d WPA: EAPOL-Key timeout
Which client are you using? Are you sure that the passphrase/PSK is set
correctly? The nohwcrypt patch should make absolutely no difference for
this part (this is key handshake which in the initial phase is sent
without encrypted EAPOL-Key frames, so neither sw nor hw crypto used).
--
Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-24 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-24 11:42 [PATCH] ath9k: Add module parameter to disable hardware crypto Jouni Malinen
2009-02-24 13:49 ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-24 14:06 ` Jouni Malinen
2009-02-24 14:23 ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-24 14:24 ` pat-lkml
2009-02-24 15:07 ` Jouni Malinen [this message]
2009-02-24 15:32 ` pat-lkml
2009-02-24 20:07 ` pat-lkml
2009-02-24 22:45 ` pat-lkml
2009-02-25 18:19 ` ath9k and TKIP hw crypto in AP mode Jouni Malinen
2009-02-25 23:46 ` pat-lkml
2009-02-26 0:10 ` pat-lkml
2009-02-26 9:10 ` Jouni Malinen
2009-02-24 16:15 ` [PATCH] ath9k: Add module parameter to disable hardware crypto Michael Buesch
2009-02-24 17:07 ` Jouni Malinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090224150710.GA1419@jm.kir.nu \
--to=j@w1.fi \
--cc=jouni.malinen@atheros.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pat-lkml@erley.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.