Re: [tip:core/percpu] bootmem: clean up arch-specific bootmem wrapping

[Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>]

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > No, when the patch was submitted for review, I pointed out the change
> > in semantics and gathered from Tejun's reaction that this wasn't done
> > intentionally.  So the problem is the change itself, not the missing
> > declaration.
> 
> Yeah, I should have regenerated the tree.  Sorry about that.

Sorry about my rude way of commenting.

> >>>From the original mail:
> > 
> > 	Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > 	> This won't suffice as reserve_bootmem() doesn't use
> > 	> alloc_bootmem_core(), so now you effectively removed the
> > 	> node-0 restriction for reserve_bootmem() on this
> > 	> configuration.
> > 
> > 	Ah... right.  :-(
> > 
> > I just wrote again because I didn't understand why Tejun acknowledged
> > the error in the patch and then it went into -tip anyway.
> > 
> > The other part of my email was just suggestions for a cleanup, I
> > wasn't referring to that when I said 'broken' - sorry if that is how
> > it came over.
> 
> It seems that the wrapping thing was broken both before and after the
> patch and can lead to panic on free path.  I'll soon post a patch to
> fix it.

Ok, thanks for looking into it!

	Hannes