All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sandeen@redhat.com
Subject: Re: ATA support for 4k sector size
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 20:07:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090226030735.GA16891@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090226025043.GJ1363@mit.edu>

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 09:50:43PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 06:27:18PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > Because of 63-sector legacy problems a bunch of ATA vendors will
> > initially ship 512/4096 drives that are not naturally aligned.
> > I.e. logical sector 63 will be aligned on a 4KB hardware sector
> > boundary to overcome the misaligned default partitioning.
> 
> Are we *sure* that this is what they plan to be doing?  Is there a way
> we can query the hardware to find out for sure what drives are doing
> what?

The drive I have that's pretending to be a 512/4k drive reports this:

$ sudo sg_readcap -l /dev/sdc
Read Capacity results:
   Protection: prot_en=0, p_type=0
   Last logical block address=625142447 (0x2542eaaf), Number of logical blocks=625142448
   Logical block length=512 bytes
   Logical blocks per physical block=3 (log base 2) [actual=8]
   Lowest aligned logical block address=0
Hence:
   Device size: 320072933376 bytes, 305245.3 MiB, 320.07 GB

This disagrees with Martin's assertion.

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-26  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-25 22:24 ATA support for 4k sector size Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] ata: Define new commands from ATA8 Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-25 22:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] ata: Add support for Long Logical Sectors and Long Physical Sectors Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-25 22:53 ` ATA support for 4k sector size H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-25 23:27   ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-25 23:33     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-25 23:51       ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26 12:43       ` Karel Zak
2009-02-26 15:17         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-25 23:42     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-25 23:55       ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-25 23:57         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-26  0:07           ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26  0:10             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-26  0:17               ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-25 23:49     ` david
2009-02-26  0:04       ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26  0:13         ` david
2009-02-26  0:20           ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26  2:50     ` Theodore Tso
2009-02-26  3:05       ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26  3:07       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2009-02-26  3:23         ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-12-11  7:05           ` James Andrewartha
2009-12-11  7:26             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-11  7:32             ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26  5:16         ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26 12:36           ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-26 15:32           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-02-26 20:35             ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-02-26 21:02               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-16 14:51                 ` Greg Freemyer
2009-03-16 16:27                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-16 17:37                     ` Greg Freemyer
2009-03-16 17:37                       ` Greg Freemyer
2009-03-16 18:11                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-03-22  1:20                         ` Bill Davidsen
2009-03-18 14:33                   ` James Bottomley
2009-02-26 18:22 ` hdparm-9.12 released Mark Lord
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-21 13:47 ATA support for 4k sector size Andries E. Brouwer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090226030735.GA16891@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.