From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: airlied@linux.ie, eric@anholt.net, keithp@keithp.com,
dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: i915 X lockup
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:32:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090227023231.76e7c65f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A7B253.906@gmail.com>
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:28:51 +0100 Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> wrote:
> everytime I run X, it gets stuck. Currently running on mmotm
> 2009-02-26-16-58, but I think this is wider problem. I had i915 disabled
> for a long time (until I noticed today).
>
> SysRq : Show Locks Held
>
> Showing all locks held in the system:
> 3 locks held by events/0/10:
> #0: (events){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8025223d>] worker_thread+0x19d/0x340
> #1: (&(&dev_priv->mm.retire_work)->work){+.+...}, at:
> [<ffffffff8025223d>] worker_thread+0x19d/0x340
> #2: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff804057ba>]
> i915_gem_retire_work_handler+0x3a/0x90
> 1 lock held by mingetty/3899:
> #0: (&tty->atomic_read_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff803cb5de>]
> n_tty_read+0x48e/0x8e0
> 1 lock held by mingetty/3900:
> #0: (&tty->atomic_read_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff803cb5de>]
> n_tty_read+0x48e/0x8e0
> 1 lock held by mingetty/3901:
> #0: (&tty->atomic_read_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff803cb5de>]
> n_tty_read+0x48e/0x8e0
> 1 lock held by X/4007:
> #0: (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8040563c>]
> i915_gem_throttle_ioctl+0x2c/0x60
> 2 locks held by bash/4105:
> #0: (sysrq_key_table_lock){......}, at: [<ffffffff803de366>]
> __handle_sysrq+0x26/0x190
> #1: (tasklist_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff80266c1f>]
> debug_show_all_locks+0x3f/0x1c0
I assume that i915_gem_throttle_ioctl->i915_gem_ring_throttle is stuck
in i915_wait_request(), holding struct_mutex. That of course makes
keventd block.
Perhaps i915_wait_request() is waiting for keventd to do something,
which is the deadlock. That "something" could be to simply finish its
current call to i915_gem_retire_work_handler().
But worse, it could be some completely other keventd handler which
isn't getting run, because that keventd instance is stuck over in
i915_gem_retire_work_handler().
IOW, the usual keventd problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 9:28 i915 X lockup Jiri Slaby
2009-02-27 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-27 10:12 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-27 10:14 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-27 10:32 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-27 13:04 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-27 13:49 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-27 23:12 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2009-02-28 0:20 ` Eric Anholt
2009-02-28 8:31 ` Jiri Slaby
2009-02-28 8:47 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-28 9:00 ` Eric Anholt
2009-02-28 18:24 ` Bruno Prémont
2009-02-28 19:57 ` Eric Anholt
2009-02-28 17:11 ` Keith Packard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090227023231.76e7c65f.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.