From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756716AbZB1EIm (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:08:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753232AbZB1EIc (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:08:32 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:45581 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751104AbZB1EIc (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:08:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:08:05 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Gary Hade Cc: roel.kluin@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: get_nid_for_pfn() returns int Message-Id: <20090227200805.23d27aa1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090228030200.GA7342@us.ibm.com> References: <4973AEEC.70504@gmail.com> <20090119175919.GA7476@us.ibm.com> <20090126223350.610b0283.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090127210727.GA9592@us.ibm.com> <25e057c00902270656x1781d04er5703058e47df455f@mail.gmail.com> <20090227213340.GB7174@us.ibm.com> <20090227134616.982fb73a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090228001400.GC7174@us.ibm.com> <20090227162249.bcd0813a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090228030200.GA7342@us.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:02:00 -0800 Gary Hade wrote: > > > > Should it unlinger? I have it in the 2.6.30 pile. > > > > > > Yes, that would be good. :) > > > > What would be good? Your answer is ambiguous. > > Sorry, I was just trying to agree that your plan to wait > until 2.6.30 works for me. Unless someone else objects > leave it in your 2.6.30 pile. I object ;) The change is obviously correct, let's merge it now. This could cause presently-working systems to stop working due to hitherto-undiscovered bugs. If so, sue me. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCDE6B003D for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:08:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:08:05 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: get_nid_for_pfn() returns int Message-Id: <20090227200805.23d27aa1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090228030200.GA7342@us.ibm.com> References: <4973AEEC.70504@gmail.com> <20090119175919.GA7476@us.ibm.com> <20090126223350.610b0283.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090127210727.GA9592@us.ibm.com> <25e057c00902270656x1781d04er5703058e47df455f@mail.gmail.com> <20090227213340.GB7174@us.ibm.com> <20090227134616.982fb73a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090228001400.GC7174@us.ibm.com> <20090227162249.bcd0813a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090228030200.GA7342@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Gary Hade Cc: roel.kluin@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com List-ID: On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:02:00 -0800 Gary Hade wrote: > > > > Should it unlinger? I have it in the 2.6.30 pile. > > > > > > Yes, that would be good. :) > > > > What would be good? Your answer is ambiguous. > > Sorry, I was just trying to agree that your plan to wait > until 2.6.30 works for me. Unless someone else objects > leave it in your 2.6.30 pile. I object ;) The change is obviously correct, let's merge it now. This could cause presently-working systems to stop working due to hitherto-undiscovered bugs. If so, sue me. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org