From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: "Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)" <narayanan.rengarajan@hp.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] : Spinning up disk is observed on standby paths until timeout, resulting in longer path restoration time.
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:26:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090228212625.GR16891@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235400748.3361.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:52:28AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:48 +0000, Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD) wrote:
> > If this patch is valid , when can we expect this on mainstream
> > kernel . I can help testing this patch when included in the kernel.
>
> If you could test it and report that it works, probably fairly
> immediately.
Narayanan reported that the patch I sent worked, but it wasn't in the push
to Linus you just sent. I'm not quite sure whether 'fairly immediately'
meant 'for 2.6.29' or 'for 2.6.30', so I don't know whether this was an
oversight or an intentional omission. In case it was the former, I'm
alerting you to it ;-)
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-28 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-20 11:14 [PATCH 1/1] : Spinning up disk is observed on standby paths until timeout, resulting in longer path restoration time Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)
2009-02-20 15:36 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 15:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-20 16:03 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 16:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-20 16:24 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 17:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-23 11:48 ` Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)
2009-02-23 14:52 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-28 21:26 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2009-02-28 23:56 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090228212625.GR16891@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=narayanan.rengarajan@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.