From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/17] tcp: remove pointless .dsack code Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 03:57:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20090302.035735.240266876.davem@davemloft.net> References: <12358322831019-git-send-email-ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> <20090302.030320.95493086.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:54520 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753358AbZCBL5v convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2009 06:57:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: "Ilpo J=E4rvinen" Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:54:17 +0200 (EET) > We'll be dirty it anyway (not that I check), the first "real" stateme= nt > in tcp_rcv_established is: >=20 > tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp =3D 0; >=20 > ...that'll land on the same dword. :-/ >=20 > I suppose the blocks are there just because they had more complexity=20 > inside when they had to calculate the eff_sacks too (maybe it would > have been better to just remove them in that drop-patch so you would > have had less head-ache :-)). That sounds like a good commit log entry for when you resubmit this patch :-)