From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] irq: remove IRQF_DISABLED
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:43:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090302144303.GA30136@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235996477.5330.174.camel@laptop>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Would you be willing to take such a patch?
>
> Its a rather big one, but if you think its a good idea, I can
> generate one against whatever tree is needed.
>
> Provided I didn't break any !genirq stuff.. then again, that
> might be a nice incentive to fix up those last few archs.
look good IMO. If there are no objections, and given that it
modifies half a thousand of files i'd suggest we do this near
the end of the merge window and not carry it in the genirq tree
- while trivial it will still generate quite a bit of conflicts.
Would that work with you?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-02 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-02 12:21 [RFC][PATCH] irq: remove IRQF_DISABLED Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-02 14:43 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-02 15:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-02 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-02 16:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-02 21:01 ` Russell King
2009-03-02 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-02 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-02 17:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-02 17:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-02 18:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-02 18:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-02 18:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-02 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-02 18:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-02 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-02 19:18 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-02 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-02 18:45 ` Vadim Lobanov
2009-03-02 18:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-05 15:40 ` Mark Lord
2009-03-02 21:17 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-06 8:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-06 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-06 9:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-06 10:05 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-06 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-06 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-03-06 21:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-02 17:55 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-02 18:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090302144303.GA30136@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.