From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: /usr/libexec/dracut/ -> /usr/lib/dracut/ Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:05:51 -0500 Message-ID: <20090304180551.GA8984@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: initramfs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Kay Sievers Cc: initramfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:28:07AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > Any objection to replace "libexec" with "lib"? > > According to LSB/FHS, applications are required to use a named > directory in /usr/lib/: > http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLIBLIBRARIESFORPROGRAMMINGANDPA > Some distros, like e.g. SUSE, don't allow packages to use libexec at all. > > Would be nice, if we could do something like: > sed -i 's#/usr/libexec/dracut#/usr/lib/dracut#' Makefile dracut dracut.spec I'm not against this change. This a particularly egregious redhat-ism that is guaranteed to break pretty much everywhere else. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html