From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sfi-mx-1.v28.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.28.121] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by 235xhf1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LfDH2-0002pA-Et for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:06:04 +0000 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.188]) by 29vjzd1.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) id 1LfDGz-0006Iw-CW for user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:06:04 +0000 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a6so3886261tib.18 for ; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:05:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 21:06:10 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang Message-ID: <20090305130610.GA4265@hack.private> References: <49AFC206.9080004@panasas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49AFC206.9080004@panasas.com> Subject: Re: [uml-devel] um: WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux List-Id: The user-mode Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: user-mode-linux-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: linux-kernel , uml-devel On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a > >Doing make ARCH=um defconfig & make ARCH=um >give's me: > >LD vmlinux.o >MODPOST vmlinux.o >WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux > > >Sorry if this is a duplicate report > Weird... I tried to compile like what you said, I can't reproduce it. Which gcc are you using? Thanks. -- Do what you love, f**k the rest! F**k the regulations! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ User-mode-linux-devel mailing list User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754588AbZCENGS (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:06:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751593AbZCENGD (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:06:03 -0500 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.191]:44217 "EHLO ti-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750728AbZCENGB (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:06:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=gUWYtj8aY7tg1fBbQ+bfmIT6eYyeA0B7sWrFA8UwooxkSSHQenCTHQ/izPfw2ncWRV R2ItgyZE4XpXR17KukPYfAlEF9FvZ2l5uKmK8q+zo9f8Zc7jMLTGuvxC+GnTY/P0KQ6h UyhzdPMRyETKzuZA5UeRMUfttkRAAuICzRNz0= Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 21:06:10 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: uml-devel , linux-kernel Subject: Re: um: WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux Message-ID: <20090305130610.GA4265@hack.private> References: <49AFC206.9080004@panasas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49AFC206.9080004@panasas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 02:13:58PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >On today's linus v2.6.29-rc7-3-g559595a > >Doing make ARCH=um defconfig & make ARCH=um >give's me: > >LD vmlinux.o >MODPOST vmlinux.o >WARNING: vmlinux: 'memcpy' exported twice. Previous export was in vmlinux > > >Sorry if this is a duplicate report > Weird... I tried to compile like what you said, I can't reproduce it. Which gcc are you using? Thanks. -- Do what you love, f**k the rest! F**k the regulations!