From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.149.226.213] (helo=smtp.host4.kei.pl) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LfFFi-0006MW-5g for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:12:50 +0100 Received: (qmail 7630 invoked by uid 813007); 5 Mar 2009 15:08:28 -0000 X-clamdmail: clamdmail 0.18a Received: from 195.149.226.213 (HELO home.localnet) (marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl@195.149.226.213) by 195.149.226.213 with ESMTPA; 5 Mar 2009 15:08:28 -0000 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:08:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc6-00216-g778ef1e; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) References: <1236182004-4523-1-git-send-email-openembedded@haerwu.biz> <20090305044711.GE26343@smtp.west.cox.net> <49AFC6A3.9070406@dls.net> In-Reply-To: <49AFC6A3.9070406@dls.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200903051608.28012.marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> Subject: Re: I got the point - did everyone one else? [was: Re: [PATCH 70/70]...] X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:12:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 05 of March 2009 13:33:39 Mike (mwester) wrote: > Yes, in the NORMAL case that would be true. =A0Seven patches - fine, > that would work. =A010x more than that? - that's clearly a case where > clear thinking would put the changes on a branch and have it reviewed > there.=20 I sent hrw/poky-rpm branch for review on 19 November 2008. It contained=20 nearly same set of patches but needed some work. **No one** (except=20 Koen) looked at it. Thats why I sent whole branch as patchset to ML.=20 During first hours it got at least 3 persons who read patches and gave=20 ideas how to improve their quality. Tom Rini even started builds to=20 check does everything works on his build machine. And yes - patchset should be squashed but I am tired of that branch=20 because I work on it since start of November. > 70 patches? =A0Come on, who's going to extract and apply 70 patches > from email? =A0Not likely! And no one has to - whole patchset is available as GIT branch and I=20 wrote about it in first mail. The good thing is that I do not plan any such big merges in near future. Regards,=20 =2D-=20 JID: hrw@jabber.org Website: http://marcin.juszkiewicz.com.pl/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcinjuszkiewicz