From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752539AbZCIG7g (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:59:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751945AbZCIG71 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:59:27 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:44868 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751921AbZCIG70 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:59:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:58:37 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Yinghai Lu Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86: fix bootmem cross node for 32bit numa Message-ID: <20090309065837.GC7057@elte.hu> References: <49AE485B.8000902@kernel.org> <86802c440903081616j3a50cc97yc4fe374e740f84c1@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86802c440903081616j3a50cc97yc4fe374e740f84c1@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Yinghai Lu wrote: > we may need this one (and two followings one) to be applied > for stable with 2.6.27, 2.6.28, 2.6.29. I'm not sure - they are rather complex and intrusive, and the further we go back the more conflicting they become. Ingo