All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Venefax <venefax@gmail.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: Red Hat dropped XEN
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:13:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090309101309.GG4578@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0cdb01c9a050$7a7e86b0$6f7b9410$@com>

On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 08:46:22PM -0400, Venefax wrote:
> I was really dismayed today when I installed the latest Red Hat 5.3 and the
> version of Xen included is 3.1. Apparently, the only distribution with Xen
> 3.3 is Suse. Am I reading here that Red Hat will never upgrade Xen to newer
> versions? I installed the released version, and it still uses Xen 3.1.

Things are not quite that simple. The RHEL-5 userspace tools are mostly on 
a 3.0.3 base, while the hypervisor and kernel are on a 3.1.0 base. The base
versions are typically not upgraded during the lifetime of a major RHEL
release series. That said, we do have a large number of carefully backported 
features & patches from newer versions, eg to add support for NPT/EPT, 
improved HVM support, hugepage support, and much more besides.  So just 
comparing version numbers won't give you a true picture of Xen features 
available in RHEL-5.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-09 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-06  5:23 [PATCH 0/2] passthrough: make management of PCI D-states by guest optional Kouya Shimura
2009-03-06  5:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] tool: " Kouya Shimura
2009-03-06  5:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] ioemu: " Kouya Shimura
2009-03-11  8:16   ` Yuji Shimada
2009-03-11  8:57     ` Kouya Shimura
2009-03-12  6:05     ` [PATCH v2 " Kouya Shimura
2009-03-06  7:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] passthrough: " Yuji Shimada
2009-03-06 13:41   ` Cui, Dexuan
2009-03-09  0:38     ` Kouya Shimura
2009-03-09  0:46       ` Red Hat dropped XEN Venefax
2009-03-09  7:41         ` Jayaraman, Bhaskar
2009-03-09  8:07           ` Keir Fraser
2009-03-09  8:06         ` Keir Fraser
2009-03-09 10:13         ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2009-03-09 10:22           ` Venefax
2009-03-09 16:41             ` Mike Brady
2009-03-09 16:45               ` Venefax
2009-03-09  5:29       ` Re: [PATCH 0/2] passthrough: make management of PCI D-states by guest optional Cui, Dexuan
2009-04-23  5:48 ` Yuji Shimada
2009-04-23  7:08   ` Kouya Shimura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090309101309.GG4578@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=venefax@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.