All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, linux-aio <linux-aio@kvack.org>,
	zach.brown@oracle.com, bcrl@kvack.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:36:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090309203624.GA2812@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B571C7.3010005@redhat.com>

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Or you could queue the completions somewhere, and only copy them to
> user memory when io_getevents() is called.  I think the plan was
> once to allow events to be consumed opportunistically even without
> io_getevents(), though.

Isn't that integrated (or to be integrated) with the vring buffer
thingy used by virtio?

If not, should it be?

> Sorry, I didn't actually take a look at the patches.  I only reacted to 
> the description - I am allergic to pinned memory.

While we're at it I'm allergic to fixed size ring buffers :-)

-- Jamie

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-09 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-09 15:49 [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 15:54 ` [patch] factor out checks against the memlock rlimit Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 15:59 ` [patch] man-pages: add documentation about the memlock implications of io_setup Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 16:45   ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-03-09 16:48   ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-03-09 20:44     ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 16:18 ` [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 17:57   ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-09 19:45     ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 20:36       ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
2009-03-10  8:36         ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-09 20:31     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  2:39       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  2:44         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-12  3:24           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  3:29             ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-12  3:33               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  3:36                 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-12  3:40                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  3:09         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  5:18           ` [PATCH] fs: fput() can be called from interrupt context Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  5:42             ` [PATCH] aio: " Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  5:47             ` [PATCH] fs: " Andrew Morton
2009-03-12  6:10               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12  6:39                 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-12 13:39                   ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-13 22:34                     ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-13 22:43                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-13 23:28                     ` Trond Myklebust
2009-03-14  1:40                       ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-14  4:02                         ` Trond Myklebust
2009-03-14 14:32                           ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-15  1:36                             ` [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context Davide Libenzi
2009-03-15 17:44                               ` Benjamin LaHaise
2009-03-15 20:08                                 ` [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context (2nd rev) Davide Libenzi
2009-03-16 17:25                                   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-03-16 18:36                                     ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-18 14:22                                   ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-18 14:46                                     ` Davide Libenzi
2009-03-18 14:55                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-18 15:25                                       ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-18 15:43                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-18 16:13                                           ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-18 17:25                                     ` [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context (3rd rev) Davide Libenzi
2009-03-18 17:34                                       ` Jeff Moyer
2009-03-12 19:22                   ` [PATCH] fs: fput() can be called from interrupt context Eric Dumazet
2009-03-12 20:21                     ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-09 22:36 ` [patch] aio: remove aio-max-nr and instead use the memlock rlimit to limit the number of pages pinned for the aio completion ring Andrew Morton
2009-03-10 13:43   ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090309203624.GA2812@shareable.org \
    --to=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.